Earlier today,
Barclays announced
the suspension of issuance of new creation units as well as sales from
inventory for two of its ETNs: the iPath Series B S&P 500® VIX Short-Term
Futures ETN (VXX);
and the iPath Pure Beta Crude Oil ETN (OIL). VXX is the premier VIX-based ETP
and has been the most popular subject on this blog for the past 13 years. It was the first
VIX ETP to launch back on January 30, 2009 (along with VXZ) and remains
the flagship product in the volatility space, averaging 70 million shares traded
per day and regularly placing among the top five ETPs in terms of both share
volume and options volume.
While the news
from Barclays was a surprise, it was not unprecedented. Credit Suisse suspended creation units in TVIX (a +2x version
of VXX) twice: once
in dramatic fashion in February 2012; and again in July
2020, when the product was delisted and moved to the pink sheets to trade
under the TVIXF ticker.
The first time
around, on February 21, 2012, there was not a VIX spike,
per se, that triggered the event. Instead,
it was the general popularity of the product and the size of holdings in the TVIX
note (ETNs are an unsecured debt note) that concerned the bank. Credit Suisse acknowledged that the TVIX note
violated the bank’s risk management rules related to the “internal limits on
the size of the ETNs” and thus triggered the suspension of creation units.
The second time
around, on July 12, 2020, the record volatility spike associated with the onset
of the pandemic caused the size of the TVIX note to be roughly half of the size
of the bank. As a result, Credit Suisse concluded
that the risk of continuing with this product was too high, so they decided to
exit the ETN business, stop issuing new creation units and delist nine ETNs.
In both 2012 and
2020, the absence of new creation units led to a supply shortage and a large
premium in the market price relative to the intraday
indicative value (IV). In 2012, new
creation units were halted for a month and a day, with the price of TVIX rising
to an 89% premium to TVIX.IV at one point.
When TVIX creation units were restored, TVIX fell 60% in three days and
soon was trading within 1% of indicative value.
In 2020, the cessation of new creation units was final and irreversible,
so TVIXF has now been trading on the pink sheets for 21 months without any new
creation units. Initially, there was
almost no premium in TVIXF to TVIX.IV, but the Reddit r/wallstreetbets crowd eventually latched onto the potential for a short squeeze in TVIX in early
February 2021 and spiked the price of TVIXF from parity to a 43% premium in two
days. Since the initial targeting by r/wallstreetbets,
the premium in TVIXF to TVIX.IV has averaged about 72% and has been as high as
160% at one point.
An even more
famous and noteworthy example of investors targeting a product with no creation
unit capabilities for a short squeeze is the plight of the VelocityShares Daily
3x Inverse Natural Gas ETN (DGAZF), which spiked from 400 to 24,000 in a week
in August 2020. The VelocityShares Daily
3x Inverse Natural Gas ETN was traded under the ticker DGAZ when it delisted,
with no new creation units along with TVIX on July 12, 2020. The combination of longs targeting a short
squeeze, limited liquidity in the OTC pink sheets, no new creation units and 3x
leverage made for a historic spike of 12,000% in one week. While such a scenario is unlikely to unfold
in VXX, it is important to understand the history and the potential for
outsized short squeezes when there are no creation units available to arbitrage
away the difference between the heavily shorted underlying and its indicative
value.
There are many other examples of ETPs that have had their creation units
suspended, with resultant price anomalies.
Deutsche Bank did it with a variety of commodities ETNs in 2011 and 2012. PowerShares also suspended creation units in
the popular PowerShares DB Oil Fund (DBO) in 2015, with yet
another large price spike.
While buyer beware is a good mantra to keep in mind when purchasing ETFs or
particularly ETNs, it is even more important for short sellers to understand
the risks of holding one or more of these products short when creation units
are suspended and particularly when the products are delisted, with trading
moving to the OTC pink sheets.
As for VXX, the reasons for the halt in creation units are not exactly clear. Barclays says in their press release:
“This suspension is being imposed because Barclays does not currently have
sufficient issuance capacity to support further sales from inventory and any
further issuances of the ETNs. These actions are not the result of the crisis
in Ukraine or any issue with the market dynamics in the underlying index
components. Barclays expects to reopen sales and issuances of the ETNs as soon
as it can accommodate additional capacity for future issuances.”
The underlying
cause of the issuance capacity issue may be a number of factors, including the
cost of hedging the position, exchange position limits or other factors. Without knowing the underlying cause, it is
difficult to predict when new creation units will be restored. That said, as VXX appreciates in price, the
size of the problem Barclays needs to tackle will continue to rise, which may
further complicate the resolution process.
Of course, when
new creation units are restored, one can expect that the price of VXX will
almost immediately fall to that of VXX.IV.
Investors, therefore, need to understand the risks associated with long
positions going forward and not find themselves in an air pocket like
TVIX longs did back in March 2012.
For this reason, anyone who is insistent upon holding a long or short
position in VXX should consider constructing a defined-risk position using
options. Alternatively, VIXY is an ETP issued by ProShares
that holds a basket of VIX futures rather than an unsecured bank note with
a promise to return the same performance as that basket of VIX futures.
It should go
without saying that everything here I addressed relative to VXX is true for OIL
as well and with all the turmoil in the oil markets related to events in Ukraine and Russia, there is
already the potential for huge moves in the underlying.
I covered the
TVIX creation units issue in considerable detail in 2012 and the links below probably
provide the most comprehensive review of this matter anywhere on the internet. I have also provided links to a number of tangential
issues related to VIX ETPs and pricing anomalies.
In the graphic
below, I show the divergence between VXX and VXX.IV during today’s regular trading
hours (Pacific Time). I find it interesting
that it took more than three hours after the initial press release before VXX
began to uncouple from VXX.IV and spike higher, ultimately reaching a 12%
premium before the divergence began to narrow during the last half hour of
trading.
Long-term, I still think VXX is likely to remain the premier VIX-based ETP, but
Barclays has some work to do to get the creation units back and the product
trading with a normal supply-demand balance.
Until then, keep a close eye on the varying premium of VXX and VXX.IV,
while evaluating alternatives such as VIXY and UVXY.