Direxion and S&P Bring Dynamic Volatility Hedging to ETFs with VEQTOR

As the ETF space continues to evolve and push into new territory, such as strategy-in-a-box ETFs and more actively managed ETFs (e.g., QAI, ALT, PQY, PQZ, GVT, PSR, RWG), it was only a matter of time before a volatility play was added to the pool of actively managed ETFs.

Credit Direxion with being the first to venture into the realm of actively managed ETFs with a strong volatility component. In a recent SEC filing, Direxion unveiled plans to launch an intriguing new ETF under the name of S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Shares. This ETF will seek to track the S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index, which was launched by S&P back on November 18, 2009.

So far, so good.

Here is where it gets interesting. The VEQTOR index (and ETF) have three components: equity (S&P 500); volatility (S&P 500 Short-Term VIX Futures Index, aka VXX) and cash. Based upon several rules and formulas, the index attempts to derive – on a daily basis – the ideal target volatility allocation. This is accomplished by evaluating realized volatility and implied volatility, determining the implied volatility trend (using 5-day and 20-day IV moving averages) and arriving at a target index volatility allocation based on realized volatility and implied volatility data. Once the target volatility allocation has been determined (the range is from 2.5% to 40.0%), the balance of the index is populated with the S&P 500.

Just to make things more interesting, the VEQTOR index also has a stop loss provision which specifies that if aggregate losses during any five day business period are 2% or higher, the index will move into a 100% cash position.

When the VEQTOR ETF is launched, I will have a lot more to say about this fascinating product. In the meantime, those interested in additional information on the VEQTOR index and ETF should try:

• S&P 500 Dynamic VEQTOR Index - Splash Page
  
• Direxion Shares ETF Trust II S-1 Form SEC Filing (covers 11 different ETFs)
  

For more on related subjects, readers are encouraged to check out:

• Chart of the Week: Strategy-in-a-Box ETFs
• Diving a Little Deeper into Strategy-in-a-Box ETFs

Disclosure(s): neutral position on VXX via options at time of writing

Leveraged ETFs, Volatility and Range-Bound Markets

I noticed that Direxion, the dean of triple ETFs, has added a handful of tools to their web site recently. These include:

• Daily/Cumulative Performance Illustrator
• Tracking Center
• Recent Volume Tool
• Volatility Tool
• Premium/Discount Tool

While all five of these tools (plus several more that are specific to Bloomberg users) are helpful for understanding how leveraged ETFs work and what to expect from them, the one that I am drawn to is the volatility tool, a snapshot of which is appended below.

If you are one of those investors who see the potential for range-bound trading in stocks and the possibility of entering The Elusive Trading Range, then straddles, strangles, butterflies and condors on leveraged ETFs are one way to capture greater premium than betting on a lack of movement in an unleveraged underlying.

Unfortunately the Direxion volatility tool is limited to 10, 30, 90 and 180-day volatility look back periods. Even more disappointing is that the source data are stale. Right now the volatility numbers are calculated on the basis of the June 30^th close. Using a good options broker or options data provider, one can build their own leveraged ETF watch list and get real-time implied volatility, etc., but kudos to Direxion for taking a small step to address some of the concerns that have been raised about leveraged ETFs in recent months.

For more on related subjects, readers are encouraged to check out:

• The Elusive Trading Range
• Sideways Markets, Covered Calls and the RUT
• Triple ETF Options Landscape One Month After New Margin Rules
• Using Options to Control Risk in Leveraged ETFs
• The Next Big Thing?

[source: Direxion]

Disclosure(s): none

ProShares Adds Four New Triple ETF Pairs

When Direxion launched the first batch of triple ETFs back in November 2008, I may have been the first person to openly champion them, even going way out on a limb with Prediction: Direxion Triple ETFs Will Revolutionize Day Trading.

Fifteen months later, triple ETFs have exploded in popularity, sometimes confounded investors and eventually prompted regulators to step in, with FINRA increasing margin requirements for triple ETFs on December 1, 2009.

Now it appears that triple ETFs have weathered the regulatory storm and occasional investor discontent, with trading volumes recently having picked up again after signs of a plateau.

Triple ETFs – particularly those which are rebalanced on a daily basis – received another vote of confidence today, as ProShares launched eight new triple ETFs. ProShares, which launched their first two triple ETFs (UPRO and SPXU) in June of last year, is now back with a broader line of index offerings. New today are two pairs which cover new ground and two that closely overlap with existing Direxion triple ETFs. The pair that interests me the most are those which track the NASDAQ-100 index (NDX): TQQQ is the new +3x ETF for the NDX; SQQQ is the new -3x ETF. Also breaking new ground are a pair linked to the Dow Jones Industrial Average: UDOW is the +3x ETF; and SDOW is the -3x variant.

The two more problematic new ETF pairs are in the mid-cap and small-cap space. For the S&P MidCap 400 index, ProShares is offering UMDD (+3x) and SMDD (-3x). The risk here is that these two offerings may be too similar to the Direxion MWJ and MWN, which are based on the Russell Midcap index. An even larger overlap problem is likely with the new ProShares Russell 2000 index ETFs, which include URTY (+3x) and SRTY (-3x). Here there is very little to distinguish these ETFs from the popular Direxion TNA and TZA ETFs.

In a market where a first mover advantage is often decisive, ProShares faces an uphill battle, but already UPRO and SPXU have been widely accepted and there is no reason to believe TQQQ/SQQQ and UDOW/SDOQ will not enjoy similar success. The prognosis for the new mid-cap and small cap ETFs, however, is not as favorable.

For the full list of triple ETF offerings, try:

• Direxion Triple ETFs
• ProShares Triple ETFs

For related posts on these subjects, readers are encouraged to check out:

• Triple ETF Options Landscape One Month After New Margin Rules
• The Next Big Thing?
• Prediction: Direxion Triple ETFs Will Revolutionize Day Trading

Disclosures: short TZA at time of writing

Triple ETF Options Landscape One Month After New Margin Rules

On December 1^st, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) implemented more stringent margin requirements for leveraged ETFs in Increased Margin Requirements for Leveraged Exchange-Traded Funds and Associated Uncovered Options.

On that day, I updated my table of all the optionable triple ETFs and now that one month has passed, I thought it might be interesting to see how the activity in these ETFs and their options may have been affected by the new margin requirements.

Using data from iVolatility.com, I have captured the highlights below. While not shown here, I should note that in the almost three months from my previous update on September 9^th to December 1^st, four different triple ETF pairs (UPRO/SPXU, TNA/TZA, DRN/DRV and EDC/EDZ) showed substantial growth in volumes and every single pair showed some signs of increased interest -- so triple ETFs had significant momentum when the new margin rules were implemented. This time around, however, the only notable growth has been in the long bond pair, TMF and TMV, which admittedly comes off of a very small base. Also, there are signs that the large cap pair (BGU/BGZ) and the developed markets pair (DZK/DPK), are starting to lose traction.

Of course, we will never know whether interest in triple ETFs might have plateaued without the FINRA rules, but it is fair to say that FINRA has now stopped the growth momentum of triple ETFs in their tracks.

I will leave it for readers to pick through the data for some other interesting observations, but I would be remiss in not noting that the bear ETF implied volatility has dropped much faster that the bull ETF implied volatility almost across the board.

For the two previous posts in this series, readers are encouraged to check out:

• Updating the Triple ETF Options Landscape
• Triple ETF Options Landscape

[source: iVolatility.com]

Disclosure: none

Updating the Triple ETF Options Landscape

A month and a half ago, in Triple ETF Options Landscape, I published a table of all the optionable triple ETFs. Lately I have received several requests to update the data from that post and I am glad to be able to do so today.

As was the case the last time around, I used data from iVolatility.com and separated the ETFs into four groups: broad index ETFs (market cap focus); sector ETFs; geography ETFs; and bond ETFs. I am also continuing my practice of color coding the ETF pairs in terms of liquidity tiers, with green being the most liquid, yellow the next most liquid, and white the least liquid.

At the time of the original post, I also included DRN and DRV, the Direxion 3x and -3x real estate ETFs, which had been launched just a couple of days earlier, on July 16^th. This time around, there are two more entries in the triple ETF stable that have seen very light trading and do not yet have options associated with them. For these reasons, I have not included in the table below the MacroShares Major Metro Up (UMM) and MacroShares Major Metro Down (DMM) ETFs, both of which are linked to triple the percentage changes in the S&P/Case-Shiller Composite-10 Home Price Index.

In terms of investor interest and adoption, during the last month and half the biggest surge in interest has been in the UPRO and SPXU S&P 500 index pair, as well as the DRN and DRV real estate index pair. I have upgraded these pairs to the green and yellow liquidity levels, respectively. The emerging markets duo of EDC and EDZ also continues to gain traction, with options volume that is now on par with the most popular of the triple ETFs.

The chart below includes data through yesterday’s close and reprises the July 17^th data for an easy comparison.

It should go without saying that these are extremely risky investment vehicles, with some peculiar characteristics. Anyone who need a good metaphor to understand just how risk triple ETFs is encouraged to check out Prediction: Triple ETFs Will Revolutionize Day Trading from November 14, 2008, when what now may seem obvious sounded then like the mutterings of a crazy man.

For related posts, readers are encouraged to check out:

• Triple ETF Options Landscape
• Using Options to Control Risk in Leveraged ETFs

[source: iVolatility]

How are SPXU and UPRO Being Traded?

Yesterday, I did my best to be provocative in Is the VIX Being Artificially Depressed by Increased Use of SPXU? One of the points I made is that SPXU could be a substitute for SPX puts (and perhaps artificially depress the VIX as a result) for those who are looking for leveraged ETFs as possible portfolio hedge. To be perfectly frank, I do not believe there will be substantial demand for SPXU (or any of the triple ETFs) as portfolio hedging vehicles, largely related to the issue of the compounding effect (see Understanding the Impact of Changing Market Exposure on Leveraged ETFs from Direxion for more details.)

In fact, when I predicted a bright future for SPXU and counterpart UPRO in The Next Big Thing? back when they launched a month ago, I envisioned three primary uses for these triple ETFs:

1. As a speculative short-term trading vehicle, with particular emphasis on day trading
2. As part of various pairs trading schemes
3. As part of the many arbitrage opportunities presented by all the large and growing family of SPX-based derivatives (futures, options, ETFs, leveraged ETFs, etc.)

While I did not envision SPXU as a viable hedging vehicle, this is largely because I was thinking in terms of a longer time frame for the hedge. If SPX puts can be utilized in increments of the one month options cycle, SPXU would be at a disadvantage trying to compete on a monthly time frame. I do believe, however, that SPXU can be a viable hedge for more than just a single trading session or an occasional two day sequence, as many have suggested. Depending on volatility levels, SPXU hedges can be left in place for up to three days with minimal risk of losses due to compounding. In my opinion, only when holding periods start to exceed four days does an SPXU hedge start to become inefficient.

With SPXU already having traded 2.3 million shares as I type this, the success of this product is now assured. While the value of SPXU as a hedging instrument pales in comparison to other possible applications, I do think SPXU can be used as an effective hedge for periods of 2-3 days at a time with an acceptable degree of compounding risk.

[source: BigCharts]

Disclosure: Long SPXU at time of writing.

Direxion Announces Reverse Splits for FAS and FAZ

Direxion formally announced today what has been rumored for awhile now, that its two most popular triple ETFs, FAS and FAZ, will undergo reverse splits after the close of trading on Wednesday, July 8^th.

FAS (financial 3x ETF), which closed Friday at 8.34, will split 1-for-5, while FAZ (financial -3x ETF), which closed Friday at 5.13 will split 1-for-10.

For more details, check out the Direxion press release.

FAS Is Now XLF

For someone who gets a kick out of volatility, the arrival of triple ETFs has been a little bit like manna from heaven. Of course the launch of the Direxion triple ETFs back in early November just happened to coincide with the highest VIX readings in history. There is nothing like record volatility, except perhaps record volatility times three.

But a lot has changed since November. The VIX traded in the 80s the month it was launched; today it was as low as 25.02. At the moment the VIX is exactly 1/3 as high as it was when it peaked in November at 81.38. For those who have been selling options, the ride down the volatility slide has been an unusually profitable one. In fact, it is likely that some of the premiums harvested in the last nine months or so will turn out to be the most bloated we will see in our trading lifetimes.

My personal interest in the triple ETFs notwithstanding, these vehicles have received mixed reviews, largely because their suitability as buy and hold investments degrades rapidly after just one trading session – with the problems exacerbated by increases in volatility. On the flip side, the recent decrease in volatility has muted some of the tracking and compounding errors inherent in leveraged ETFs. In fact, in the current environment, the 3x and -3x ETFs are starting to look somewhat tame relative to their history. The two charts below show the (30 day) historical volatility (purple line) and implied volatility (gold line) of the most popular financial sector ETF, XLF, and the 3x financial sector ETF that has taken the trading world by storm, FAS. While there are a number of interesting conclusions to be drawn from these charts, the point I wish to make is that current historical and implied volatility for FAS (top chart) is hovering around the 100 mark, which is about where HV and IV were for XLF (bottom chart) in February, March and April. In other words, the 3x ETF FAS is no more volatile or has more uncertainty in its stock price now than XLF did during the period from October through April. Tracking error aside, FAS is now effectively the ghost of XLF.

[source: iVolatility]

The Next Big Thing?

This morning ProShares launched two new triple ETFs. Now before you exclaim, “Enough already!” consider that the new ETFs are designed to track the daily moves of the S&P 500 index. As such, these are the first 3x and -3x ETFs that track the SPX directly. For this reason alone, the two new ETFs are can’t miss products. While these triple ETFs will have some interesting hedging applications, the fact that they have a target tracking period of one trading day, like the Direxion Daily ETFs, means they will probably become very hot in the day trading space. Don’t be surprised to see 100 million shares traded in both of these within a few months.

The official names of the new ETFs are the Ultra ProShares (UPRO) and Short ProShares (SPXU). For more information on these ETFs, check out their prospectus.

Using Options to Control Risk in Leveraged ETFs

Several readers noted that options on leveraged ETFs seemed like a recipe for disaster, as if no good could possibly come from piling leverage on top of leverage. While I certainly understand the sentiment, this type of thinking is typical of investors who have little or no experience in options. To the investor who is not versed in options, the options world often seems to be limited to an occasional covered call or an out-of-the-money call that is barely distinguishable from a lottery ticket – and seems to pay out just about as often.

In fact a large percentage of options traders are attracted to options because they are an excellent way to define, limit and manage risk. Yes, one can buy a put to provide protection for a long stock protection, but in the absence of owning the underlying (be it as stock, ETF, index or whatever), options traders are particularly fond of creating multi-leg options positions where the downside risk is known at the beginning of the trade and does not waver as long as the position is maintained.

Getting back to leveraged ETFs, I have reproduced a portion of the options chain for FAS, perhaps the most notorious of the Direxion triple ETFs, in the table below. With a current mean implied volatility of 126, FAS is a highly volatile ETF. FAS is so volatile that even with only 17 trading days remaining in the June calls, it is possible to sell the June 15 calls, which are 70% out of the money, for 0.05. The June 11 calls, which are 24.4% out of the money, can be sold for 0.40.

In terms of risk management, let’s say that an investor does not believe that FAS is going to rise more than 24% in the next 3 ½ weeks, so he or she decides to sell the June 11 calls, but hedge that position by buying an equal amount of the June 13 calls at 0.15. This is a bear call spread and will net $25 for each option contract, with a maximum loss of $175 per contract (not including commissions). The trade makes money if FAS expires at 11.25 or less, which means that the position can absorb up to a 27.2% gain in FAS. The trade offers odds of 7-1 ($175 to $25) and the maximum risk is defined up front and cannot change during the life of the trade.

This is but one example of how options can limit the risk of trading triple ETFs. There are many other potential examples.

The bottom line is that options trades can be structured in such a manner that they are much less risky than stock trades, even if the options are on volatile securities such as triple ETFs.

[As an aside, readers may have noticed that up to this point I have somewhat standardized on the options tools and graphics available through optionsXpress. Going forward, I will make an effort do a better job of highlighting some of the tools and content available at various other options brokers in order to illustrate some of what is available to the reader and at the very minimum, provide more visual variety.]

[source: OptionsHouse]

Disclosure: Short FAS at time of writing.

Options on the Direxion Leveraged ETFs

The last time I checked in with the Direxion triple ETFs was in early February, when I asked Why Is There So Little Volume in the Most Recent Direxion ETFs? While that question did not receive a direct answer, I noted that in subsequent weeks, volume picked up dramatically in the two most volatile new pairs, the emerging markets (EDC and EDZ) and technology (TYH and TYP) ETFs.

Toward the end of February, Direxion launched another triple ETF pair, the mid cap bull (MWJ) and mid cap bear (MWN) ETFs. In mid-April, Direxion added some triple ETF bonds to the mix, with a 30-Year U.S. Treasury bull (TMF) and bear (TMV) pair, as well as a 10-Year U.S. Treasury bull (TYD) and bear (TYO) pair.

For more details on the current Direxion triple ETF lineup, check out the graphic below or visit the Direxion Shares ETF web site.

In addition to expanding the universe of available triple ETFs, Direxion has sought to address criticism of the tracking error in these ETFs by adding a “Daily” prefix to each ETF name, in order to emphasize that these ETFs are rebalanced on a daily basis and only attempt to match daily moves, not track the target indices over an extended period of time. Interestingly, anyone who visits the Direxion Shares home page is met first with, “Direxion Shares are not for everyone. Are they for you?” and a link that attempts to dissuade what they describe as the conservative investor.

One of the aspects of triple ETFs that I find has some interesting strategic implications is the availability of options. As of this week, there are now options available on all of the Direxion triple ETFs with the exception of the ones based on the EAFE index, DZK and DPK.

Needless to say, there are very few trading vehicles out there with the potential to move as rapidly as options on triple ETFs, but for experienced options traders, these options offer a great deal of potential reward, paired with commensurate risk, of course.

[graphic: Direxion Shares]

Disclosure: Long TYP at time of writing.

Why Is There So Little Volume in the Most Recent Direxion ETFs?

It seems as if every day trader I know has fallen under the spell of the leveraged firepower of the Direxion triple ETFs. Oddly, only the first batch of ETFs that were rolled out in November have caught fire. These include the familiar tickers like FAS, FAZ, TNA, TZA, BGU, BGZ, ERX and ERY.

The most recent group of ETFs, which I discussed in Direxion Triple ETFs Add New Horses to Stable, has attracted considerably less interest. Even though they were launched at the end of December, only two of the six ETFs, EDC and TYH, have surpassed the 100,000 single day volume mark and TYH just grazed that bar, with a high volume mark of 101,900. In the chart below, a snapshot taken just past the halfway point of today’s session, the six new ETFs can be seen floundering at the bottom.

Juice is not the problem, as emerging markets (EDC and EDZ) and technology (TYH and TYP) are consistently among the most volatile corners of the market.

The comments on yesterday’s semi-rhetorical question we excellent. Let’s see what sort of explanation the collective wisdom can come up with today.

[source: Yahoo]

First Day of Trading in VXX and VXZ a Success

The first day of trading in the VIX ETNs was an unqualified success. Volume in the iPath S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures (1 month) ETN (VXX) hit 215,700 shares, while its 5 month counterpart, (VXZ), traded 73,900 shares.

To put these numbers in perspective, on the first day the Direxion triple ETFs were traded (in early November 2008), they registered volumes of 19,063 (BGU), 30,783 (TNA) and 10,313 (FAS). Less than three months later the least popular of the three ETFs is now consistently trading more than 10 million shares per day.

While predicting success for the Direxion ETFs looked like a no-brainer for me, the idiosyncrasies of the VIX and the VIX ETNs means that it is more difficult to guarantee superstar status for today’s new market entrants, even if they had a more impressive opening day. It may take a while, for instance, for investors to decide whether the new VIX ETNs are best suited to day trading, pairs trading, hedging, arbitrage or other strategies, but clearly VXX and VXZ have the potential to be in the top tier of the ETF/ETN trading vehicles.

In terms of relative price movement, the chart below highlights the differences between the most volatile cash/spot VIX (black line), the less volatile VXX (gold line), and the comparatively sluggish VXZ (blue line). At different times during the day, VXX moved at about 50-80% of the rate of the VIX. Not surprisingly, the longer-term sibling, VXZ, captured the overall upward trend in volatility, but was reluctant to reverse direction.

It is always difficult to draw meaningful conclusions from one day of data, but now that there are finally some VIX ETN data points to talk about, at least we can begin to extrapolate in the direction of a statistically significant universe.

[source: BigCharts]

Direxion Triple ETFs Add New Horses to Stable

While skeptics abound about the usefulness of triple ETFs for the long-term investor, I have been saying since early on that the Direxion triple ETFs would revolutionize day trading.

Now that their novelty has worn thin and traders have had an opportunity to experiment with various approaches to trading triple ETFs, these vehicles have become an integral part of the day trading scene, particularly on trend days.

Looking to capitalize on the appeal of these nuclear-tipped trading weapons, Direxion added six new triple ETFs last month. While interest in the new round of ETFs has so far been limited, I predict at least one of the triple ETF pairs has a bright future. My candidates for stardom are the pair of emerging markets ETFs: the 3x bull (EDC) and the -3x bear (EDZ). The reason is simply a lack of competition. At the moment, competition comes in the form of EEV the -2x UltraShort MSCI Emerging Markets ETF from ProShares. While EEV is a popular double inverse ETF, it lacks a companion +2x version for those who want a leveraged bullish play on emerging markets without having to short EEV.

It is harder to see the other new ETF pairs attracting the same attention that the emerging markets are likely to receive. Technology is a favorite investment theme and a source of considerable volatility, but the current ROM (2x) and REW (-2x) have always been second tier ETFs in terms of popularity, lagging well behind QLD and QID, the popular NASDAQ-100 ETFs. The new Direxion entries, TYH (3x) and TYP (-3x) clearly have their work cut out for them.

Last but not least are a pair of ETFs based on the MSCI EAFE index of developed markets and the popular EFA ETF that tracks this index of European, Australasian and Far East companies. The 3x bull (DZK) and the -3x bear (DPK) have a lot of appeal to me as a means by which to speculate or hedge in non-U.S. companies, but whether these funds will receive the same kind of attention as EFA remains to be seen.

For the record, Direxion has outlined their intention to expand the stable of triple ETFs to 32 in their current prospectus. The ETFs currently in the pipeline have a strong international (China, India, Latin America, BRIC) and sector (clean energy, real estate, homebuilders) flavor. The graphic below shows the triple ETFs currently available, with the recent additions circled in red.

These ETFs are not for the faint of heart and anyone who considers trading these might want to read my initial post on the subject to get a sense of some of the risks involved.

[source: Direxion]

Are FAS Options Cheap with an Implied Volatility of 232?

Generally the thought of buying some options on the cheap is not consistent with an implied volatility (IV) of 232.

Today, I have a counterexample to consider.

Take the case of FAS, one of the new Direxion triple leverage ETFs. FAS is intended to track 300% of the price performance of the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index. In the recent market environment this has proven to be a daunting task, resulting in FAS racking up a 30 day historical volatility number of 332 – a full 100 points higher than the current implied volatility.

In practical terms, an IV of 232 translates into an anticipated average change of 14.6% per day. For comparison purposes, an IV of 332 translates into an average daily move of 21%. So far the mean one day change in closing prices for FAS has been 17.4%. Looking at recent history, an implied volatility of 232 may turn out to be a bargain and options in FAS may not be as expensive as they look…

[source: International Securities Exchange]

The Direxion Triple ETF Revolution Has Arrived!

Three weeks ago last Friday I thought I may be sticking my head out a little too far in Prediction: Direxion Triple ETFs Will Revolutionize Day Trading. Well, here we are barely three weeks later and these triple ETFs are racking up more volume in the first half hour of today’s session than they did in an entire trading day when I made my original prediction. (see graphic below)

In short, the revolution has already arrived.

Sure, there have been some issues with tracking error as Adam at Daily Options pointed out in Triple the Fun. On an intra-day basis, however, these ETFs seem to track and trend relatively accurately. And if you get the direction right, are you really going to be upset that you were right a factor of say only 2.7 times the underlying instead of an advertised multiplier of 3.0? Either way, it was still probably a wise allocation of capital.

The next frontier may turn out to be options strategies associated with these 3x and -3x ETFs. All eight of these ETFs are optionable and options activity seems to be picking up rapidly, particularly in BGU, the large cap 3x bull ETF, which currently sports an implied volatility of about 150 and a historical volatility in excess of 200.

[source: Yahoo]

Prediction: Direxion Triple ETFs Will Revolutionize Day Trading

I promised myself that once the new Direxion 3x and -3x ETFs started trading at least a million shares a day that I would take them out for a test drive. Well, I didn’t have to wait very long. Launched just last week, two of the eight new ETFs hit the million share mark yesterday and a third missed only by a rounding error.

To recap for those who do not follow this space, Direxion is the first company to offer ETFs that have a targeted return which is leveraged to three times and minus three times that of the underlying indices. So far the biggest successes have been the large cap 3x bull (BGU) and large cap -3x bear (BGZ) ETFs, which are based on the Russell 1000 index. Also proving popular are the small cap 3x bull (TNA) and small cap -3x bear (TZA) ETFs, which follow the Russell 2000 index.

The sector ETFs are off to a slower start. These include the large cap 3x bull (FAS) and large cap -3x bear (FAZ) based on the Russell 1000 financial services index; and the large cap 3x bull (ERX) and large cap bear (ERY) based on the Russell 1000 energy index.

A look at the table below of yesterday’s results shows that these ETFs are like nuclear weapons when it comes to volatility. The average change in these eight ETFs yesterday was a 25% difference from the previous day’s close. ERY closed at 52.44 yesterday. Not only did it lose 28.48 points, but its intra-day range was 35.06 points. It is only a slight exaggeration to say that you can sneeze and miss your position losing ten points. Needless to say, these super-charged ETFs are not for everyone. If you like to go skydiving, keep a pet alligator in the bathtub, and dream of a winter king crab fishing in the Bering Strait, then you will be right at home with the Direxion ETFs.

As I traded these for the first time on yesterday, several interesting things happened. First, just entering a position was an adventure, almost like trying to jump in a Lamborghini while it sped by at 120 mph. I immediately went into position management mode, because the value of my ETF was changing so quickly that it required my full attention. Very quickly, I realized that one cannot trade these triple ETFs without finely honed trading rules and an iron will to act on them at all costs. In this world, there is no room for hoping. Any sort of “it will come back” thinking could quickly turn a 5% loss into a devastating 20% loss. Ironically, the high volatility of these ETFs forces the trader to rely on (or learn) tight trading discipline.

Retail investors might want to take these ETFs out for a test drive too, but be forewarned that there is a disaster scenario looming around every corner. For these very same reasons, I anticipate that hedge funds currently day trading options will find these ETFs to their liking, particularly as volume and liquidity improve. In a deleveraging world, this is one way to stock up on “off balance sheet leverage” and get the extra juice without having to commit to the extra margin.

Not that extra leverage is usually a good thing…

[source: Yahoo]